test(communication)+test(sitecallaudit): cap parallelism, delta/collection-serialize gauge asserts, replace sleep-then-assert, stop leaked 100ms tickers (arch-review 2026-08-19 P8-5 + P8-6, register rows 40/82/95/96/102 patterns)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -114,6 +114,20 @@ public class SiteCallAuditPurgeTests : TestKit
|
||||
NullLogger<SiteCallAuditActor>.Instance)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Row-82/row-95 house pattern: every test in this file arms a
|
||||
/// <c>PurgeIntervalOverride = 100ms</c> ticker. Left running past the test's own
|
||||
/// assertions it keeps firing against the recording repo — and, worse, against a
|
||||
/// scope-per-tick DI container whose lifetime the test no longer controls — for the
|
||||
/// rest of the assembly's run, stranding later tests. Stop it deterministically.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
private void StopTicker(IActorRef actor)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Watch(actor);
|
||||
Sys.Stop(actor);
|
||||
ExpectTerminated(actor, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// 1. PurgeTick_CallsPurgeTerminal_WithRetentionThreshold
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -124,21 +138,27 @@ public class SiteCallAuditPurgeTests : TestKit
|
||||
var repo = new RecordingRepo { RowsDeletedPerCall = 7 };
|
||||
// Non-default retention (30 days) so the assertion isn't accidentally
|
||||
// satisfied by the 365-day default.
|
||||
CreateActor(repo, FastPurgeOptions(retentionDays: 30));
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(repo, FastPurgeOptions(retentionDays: 30));
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.PurgeThresholds.Count >= 1,
|
||||
$"expected >= 1 PurgeTerminalAsync call, got {repo.PurgeThresholds.Count}"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.PurgeThresholds.Count >= 1,
|
||||
$"expected >= 1 PurgeTerminalAsync call, got {repo.PurgeThresholds.Count}"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
// The threshold the actor passed must be ~UtcNow - 30 days. 1-minute
|
||||
// slack covers scheduling jitter between the tick firing and the assert.
|
||||
var threshold = repo.PurgeThresholds[0];
|
||||
var expected = DateTime.UtcNow - TimeSpan.FromDays(30);
|
||||
Assert.True(
|
||||
Math.Abs((threshold - expected).TotalMinutes) < 1.0,
|
||||
$"purge threshold {threshold:o} should be within 1 minute of {expected:o}");
|
||||
// The threshold the actor passed must be ~UtcNow - 30 days. 1-minute
|
||||
// slack covers scheduling jitter between the tick firing and the assert.
|
||||
var threshold = repo.PurgeThresholds[0];
|
||||
var expected = DateTime.UtcNow - TimeSpan.FromDays(30);
|
||||
Assert.True(
|
||||
Math.Abs((threshold - expected).TotalMinutes) < 1.0,
|
||||
$"purge threshold {threshold:o} should be within 1 minute of {expected:o}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -149,18 +169,24 @@ public class SiteCallAuditPurgeTests : TestKit
|
||||
public void PurgeTick_DefaultRetention_Uses365DayThreshold()
|
||||
{
|
||||
var repo = new RecordingRepo();
|
||||
CreateActor(repo, FastPurgeOptions()); // default 365 days
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(repo, FastPurgeOptions()); // default 365 days
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.PurgeThresholds.Count >= 1),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.PurgeThresholds.Count >= 1),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
var threshold = repo.PurgeThresholds[0];
|
||||
var expected = DateTime.UtcNow - TimeSpan.FromDays(365);
|
||||
Assert.True(
|
||||
Math.Abs((threshold - expected).TotalMinutes) < 1.0,
|
||||
$"purge threshold {threshold:o} should be within 1 minute of {expected:o}");
|
||||
var threshold = repo.PurgeThresholds[0];
|
||||
var expected = DateTime.UtcNow - TimeSpan.FromDays(365);
|
||||
Assert.True(
|
||||
Math.Abs((threshold - expected).TotalMinutes) < 1.0,
|
||||
$"purge threshold {threshold:o} should be within 1 minute of {expected:o}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -171,16 +197,22 @@ public class SiteCallAuditPurgeTests : TestKit
|
||||
public void PurgeTick_PurgeThrows_ActorStaysAlive_RetriesNextTick()
|
||||
{
|
||||
var repo = new PurgeThrowingRepo();
|
||||
CreateActor(repo, FastPurgeOptions());
|
||||
|
||||
// The singleton must NOT die on a purge fault — a second tick must still
|
||||
// arrive (continue-on-error). Two purge calls prove the actor survived
|
||||
// the first throw and the timer kept ticking.
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.PurgeCallCount >= 2,
|
||||
$"expected >= 2 purge attempts (actor survived the throw), got {repo.PurgeCallCount}"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(repo, FastPurgeOptions());
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
// The singleton must NOT die on a purge fault — a second tick must still
|
||||
// arrive (continue-on-error). Two purge calls prove the actor survived
|
||||
// the first throw and the timer kept ticking.
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.PurgeCallCount >= 2,
|
||||
$"expected >= 2 purge attempts (actor survived the throw), got {repo.PurgeCallCount}"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -206,24 +238,30 @@ public class SiteCallAuditPurgeTests : TestKit
|
||||
.BuildServiceProvider();
|
||||
|
||||
var options = FastPurgeOptions(retentionDays: 30);
|
||||
Sys.ActorOf(Props.Create(() => new SiteCallAuditActor(
|
||||
var actor = Sys.ActorOf(Props.Create(() => new SiteCallAuditActor(
|
||||
provider,
|
||||
options,
|
||||
NullLogger<SiteCallAuditActor>.Instance)));
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
// No reconciliation collaborators were registered, yet the purge tick
|
||||
// must still fire on the production path.
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.PurgeThresholds.Count >= 1,
|
||||
"purge timer must arm even when the reconciliation collaborators are absent "
|
||||
+ $"(SiteCallAudit-007), got {repo.PurgeThresholds.Count} purge calls"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
// No reconciliation collaborators were registered, yet the purge tick
|
||||
// must still fire on the production path.
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.PurgeThresholds.Count >= 1,
|
||||
"purge timer must arm even when the reconciliation collaborators are absent "
|
||||
+ $"(SiteCallAudit-007), got {repo.PurgeThresholds.Count} purge calls"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
var threshold = repo.PurgeThresholds[0];
|
||||
var expected = DateTime.UtcNow - TimeSpan.FromDays(30);
|
||||
Assert.True(
|
||||
Math.Abs((threshold - expected).TotalMinutes) < 1.0,
|
||||
$"purge threshold {threshold:o} should be within 1 minute of {expected:o}");
|
||||
var threshold = repo.PurgeThresholds[0];
|
||||
var expected = DateTime.UtcNow - TimeSpan.FromDays(30);
|
||||
Assert.True(
|
||||
Math.Abs((threshold - expected).TotalMinutes) < 1.0,
|
||||
$"purge threshold {threshold:o} should be within 1 minute of {expected:o}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+236
-148
@@ -251,6 +251,20 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
NullLogger<SiteCallAuditActor>.Instance)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Row-82/row-95 house pattern: every actor built above arms a fast-repeating
|
||||
/// reconciliation (and, via <see cref="SiteCallAuditActor"/>, purge) ticker — as fast
|
||||
/// as 100ms in most of the tests below. Left running past the owning test it keeps
|
||||
/// firing against test doubles the test has stopped controlling, stranding later
|
||||
/// tests in the same assembly. Stop it deterministically before the test ends.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
private void StopTicker(IActorRef actor)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Watch(actor);
|
||||
Sys.Stop(actor);
|
||||
ExpectTerminated(actor, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// 1. AbsentRow_PulledFromSite_IsUpserted
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -267,18 +281,24 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
new PullSiteCallsResponse(new[] { row }, MoreAvailable: false));
|
||||
var repo = new RecordingRepo();
|
||||
|
||||
CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(id),
|
||||
"reconciliation tick should upsert the row present at the site but absent centrally");
|
||||
Assert.Equal("Parked", repo.Upserted[id].Status);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(siteId, repo.Upserted[id].SourceSite);
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(id),
|
||||
"reconciliation tick should upsert the row present at the site but absent centrally");
|
||||
Assert.Equal("Parked", repo.Upserted[id].Status);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(siteId, repo.Upserted[id].SourceSite);
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -304,18 +324,24 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
new PullSiteCallsResponse(new[] { r1, r2, r3 }, MoreAvailable: false));
|
||||
var repo = new RecordingRepo();
|
||||
|
||||
CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(client.Calls.Count >= 2,
|
||||
$"need at least 2 pulls to assert cursor advancement, got {client.Calls.Count}"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(client.Calls.Count >= 2,
|
||||
$"need at least 2 pulls to assert cursor advancement, got {client.Calls.Count}"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
Assert.Equal(DateTime.MinValue, client.Calls[0].SinceUtc);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(t3, client.Calls[1].SinceUtc);
|
||||
// The batch size flows through from options.
|
||||
Assert.Equal(500, client.Calls[0].BatchSize);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(DateTime.MinValue, client.Calls[0].SinceUtc);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(t3, client.Calls[1].SinceUtc);
|
||||
// The batch size flows through from options.
|
||||
Assert.Equal(500, client.Calls[0].BatchSize);
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -337,19 +363,25 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
.Script(siteB, new PullSiteCallsResponse(new[] { bRow }, MoreAvailable: false));
|
||||
var repo = new RecordingRepo();
|
||||
|
||||
CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// siteA was attempted (and threw) yet siteB's row still landed —
|
||||
// one offline site must not sink the rest of the tick.
|
||||
Assert.Contains(client.Calls, c => c.SiteId == "siteA");
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(bId),
|
||||
"siteB must be reconciled even though siteA threw");
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// siteA was attempted (and threw) yet siteB's row still landed —
|
||||
// one offline site must not sink the rest of the tick.
|
||||
Assert.Contains(client.Calls, c => c.SiteId == "siteA");
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(bId),
|
||||
"siteB must be reconciled even though siteA threw");
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -369,7 +401,7 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
// this actor upserted nothing on its own.
|
||||
var repo = new RecordingRepo();
|
||||
var bareProvider = TestSupport.StubRepositoryProvider.Build(repo);
|
||||
Sys.ActorOf(Props.Create(() => new SiteCallAuditActor(
|
||||
var bareActor = Sys.ActorOf(Props.Create(() => new SiteCallAuditActor(
|
||||
bareProvider,
|
||||
FastTickOptions(),
|
||||
NullLogger<SiteCallAuditActor>.Instance)));
|
||||
@@ -379,20 +411,28 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
// collaborator-less actor would have ticked too, had it been wired.
|
||||
var liveClient = new ScriptedPullClient();
|
||||
var liveRepo = new RecordingRepo();
|
||||
CreateActor(
|
||||
var liveActor = CreateActor(
|
||||
new StaticEnumerator(new SiteEntry("siteX", "http://siteX:8083")),
|
||||
liveClient,
|
||||
liveRepo,
|
||||
FastTickOptions());
|
||||
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(liveClient.Calls.Count >= 1),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(liveClient.Calls.Count >= 1),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
// The collaborator-less actor never reconciles: it has no client to pull
|
||||
// with, so it upserts nothing on its own.
|
||||
Assert.Equal(0, repo.UpsertCallCount);
|
||||
// The collaborator-less actor never reconciles: it has no client to pull
|
||||
// with, so it upserts nothing on its own.
|
||||
Assert.Equal(0, repo.UpsertCallCount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(liveActor);
|
||||
StopTicker(bareActor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -431,26 +471,32 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
ReconciliationBatchSize = 2,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
CreateActor(sites, client, repo, options);
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, options);
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// All three rows reconciled — including the page-2 row that only a
|
||||
// within-tick continuation pull could have fetched.
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(p1a.TrackedOperationId));
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(p1b.TrackedOperationId));
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(p2.TrackedOperationId),
|
||||
"the page-2 row must be reconciled within the same tick via the MoreAvailable continuation drain");
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// All three rows reconciled — including the page-2 row that only a
|
||||
// within-tick continuation pull could have fetched.
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(p1a.TrackedOperationId));
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(p1b.TrackedOperationId));
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(p2.TrackedOperationId),
|
||||
"the page-2 row must be reconciled within the same tick via the MoreAvailable continuation drain");
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
// Exactly two pulls happened (page 1 + the continuation page 2) and the
|
||||
// second pull's `since` cursor advanced to the page-1 max (t2).
|
||||
Assert.True(client.Calls.Count >= 2, $"expected >= 2 pulls within the tick, got {client.Calls.Count}");
|
||||
Assert.Equal(DateTime.MinValue, client.Calls[0].SinceUtc);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(t2, client.Calls[1].SinceUtc);
|
||||
// Exactly two pulls happened (page 1 + the continuation page 2) and the
|
||||
// second pull's `since` cursor advanced to the page-1 max (t2).
|
||||
Assert.True(client.Calls.Count >= 2, $"expected >= 2 pulls within the tick, got {client.Calls.Count}");
|
||||
Assert.Equal(DateTime.MinValue, client.Calls[0].SinceUtc);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(t2, client.Calls[1].SinceUtc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -484,35 +530,41 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
ReconciliationBatchSize = 2,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
CreateActor(sites, client, repo, options);
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, options);
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(client.CallCount >= 1, "the first reconciliation tick should have pulled"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(client.CallCount >= 1, "the first reconciliation tick should have pulled"),
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
// The rows it saw were still upserted (idempotent mirror refresh).
|
||||
// Awaited, not asserted flat: the upsert follows the pull asynchronously,
|
||||
// so gating on CallCount alone races the repo write under parallel load
|
||||
// (observed once in a full-suite run, 2026-08-17).
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(r1.TrackedOperationId));
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(r2.TrackedOperationId));
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
// The rows it saw were still upserted (idempotent mirror refresh).
|
||||
// Awaited, not asserted flat: the upsert follows the pull asynchronously,
|
||||
// so gating on CallCount alone races the repo write under parallel load
|
||||
// (observed once in a full-suite run, 2026-08-17).
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(r1.TrackedOperationId));
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(r2.TrackedOperationId));
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
// Critical SiteCallAudit-009 invariant: the within-tick drain BROKE on the
|
||||
// no-progress pin rather than looping to the 50-page ceiling. With a 2s
|
||||
// tick interval, only the first tick has fired in the window, so the pull
|
||||
// count reflects ONE tick's within-loop behaviour. A correct break yields
|
||||
// 1 pull for that tick; we allow a small margin for a possible second tick
|
||||
// edge, but it must be far below the 50-page within-tick ceiling.
|
||||
Assert.True(client.CallCount < 10,
|
||||
$"a single-timestamp saturation pin must break the within-tick drain, not spin to the "
|
||||
+ $"page ceiling; got {client.CallCount} pulls (an unbounded within-tick loop would be 50+)");
|
||||
// Critical SiteCallAudit-009 invariant: the within-tick drain BROKE on the
|
||||
// no-progress pin rather than looping to the 50-page ceiling. With a 2s
|
||||
// tick interval, only the first tick has fired in the window, so the pull
|
||||
// count reflects ONE tick's within-loop behaviour. A correct break yields
|
||||
// 1 pull for that tick; we allow a small margin for a possible second tick
|
||||
// edge, but it must be far below the 50-page within-tick ceiling.
|
||||
Assert.True(client.CallCount < 10,
|
||||
$"a single-timestamp saturation pin must break the within-tick drain, not spin to the "
|
||||
+ $"page ceiling; got {client.CallCount} pulls (an unbounded within-tick loop would be 50+)");
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -546,24 +598,30 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
ReconciliationBatchSize = 2,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
CreateActor(sites, client, repo, options);
|
||||
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
foreach (var r in rows)
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, options);
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(r.TrackedOperationId),
|
||||
"every row in the single-timestamp burst must reconcile via the "
|
||||
+ "composite keyset cursor within one tick");
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
foreach (var r in rows)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert.True(repo.Upserted.ContainsKey(r.TrackedOperationId),
|
||||
"every row in the single-timestamp burst must reconcile via the "
|
||||
+ "composite keyset cursor within one tick");
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
duration: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3),
|
||||
interval: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
|
||||
|
||||
// Two pages (2 + 2) drained the burst; well under the 50-page ceiling.
|
||||
Assert.True(client.CallCount is >= 2 and < 10,
|
||||
$"expected the burst to drain in a couple of keyset pages, got {client.CallCount}");
|
||||
// Two pages (2 + 2) drained the burst; well under the 50-page ceiling.
|
||||
Assert.True(client.CallCount is >= 2 and < 10,
|
||||
$"expected the burst to drain in a couple of keyset pages, got {client.CallCount}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -593,11 +651,17 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
ReconciliationBatchSize = 2,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
CreateActor(sites, client, repo, options);
|
||||
|
||||
var evt = ExpectMsg<SiteCallReconciliationPinnedChanged>(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
Assert.Equal(siteId, evt.SiteId);
|
||||
Assert.True(evt.Pinned, "a legacy site that ignores after_id must publish Pinned=true");
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, options);
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
var evt = ExpectMsg<SiteCallReconciliationPinnedChanged>(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
Assert.Equal(siteId, evt.SiteId);
|
||||
Assert.True(evt.Pinned, "a legacy site that ignores after_id must publish Pinned=true");
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -648,22 +712,30 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
|
||||
// Wait until the drain is genuinely in flight and blocked inside PullAsync.
|
||||
await client.Entered.WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Wait until the drain is genuinely in flight and blocked inside PullAsync.
|
||||
await client.Entered.WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
|
||||
// The mailbox must still be serving. A generous-but-finite budget: this
|
||||
// fails at the pre-fix behaviour (the reply only arrives once the pull
|
||||
// unblocks, which never happens until Release below).
|
||||
var id = TrackedOperationId.New();
|
||||
var reply = await actor.Ask<UpsertSiteCallReply>(
|
||||
new UpsertSiteCallCommand(NewRow(id, sourceSite: siteId)),
|
||||
TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3));
|
||||
// The mailbox must still be serving. A generous-but-finite budget: this
|
||||
// fails at the pre-fix behaviour (the reply only arrives once the pull
|
||||
// unblocks, which never happens until Release below).
|
||||
var id = TrackedOperationId.New();
|
||||
var reply = await actor.Ask<UpsertSiteCallReply>(
|
||||
new UpsertSiteCallCommand(NewRow(id, sourceSite: siteId)),
|
||||
TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3));
|
||||
|
||||
Assert.True(reply.Accepted);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(id, reply.TrackedOperationId);
|
||||
|
||||
// Let the drain finish so the actor shuts down cleanly.
|
||||
client.Release();
|
||||
Assert.True(reply.Accepted);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(id, reply.TrackedOperationId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Unblock the drain FIRST so the actor is free to process the Stop rather
|
||||
// than parked inside the blocked pull, then stop it deterministically
|
||||
// rather than leaving its 100ms ticker running (row-95).
|
||||
client.Release();
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
@@ -678,16 +750,25 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
var client = new CountingBlockingPullClient();
|
||||
var repo = new RecordingRepo();
|
||||
|
||||
CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
|
||||
await client.Entered.WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
await client.Entered.WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
|
||||
// Several tick intervals elapse while the first pass is still blocked.
|
||||
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(600));
|
||||
// Several tick intervals elapse while the first pass is still blocked.
|
||||
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(600));
|
||||
|
||||
Assert.Equal(1, client.CallCount);
|
||||
|
||||
client.Release();
|
||||
Assert.Equal(1, client.CallCount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Unblock the drain FIRST so the actor is free to process the Stop, then
|
||||
// stop it deterministically rather than leaving its 100ms ticker running
|
||||
// (row-95).
|
||||
client.Release();
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
@@ -715,25 +796,32 @@ public class SiteCallAuditReconciliationTests : TestKit
|
||||
|
||||
var actor = CreateActor(sites, client, repo, FastTickOptions());
|
||||
|
||||
// Once the pull has been served the drain is upserting; flood the mailbox
|
||||
// with ingest commands so the two writers overlap in wall-clock time.
|
||||
await client.Entered.WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Once the pull has been served the drain is upserting; flood the mailbox
|
||||
// with ingest commands so the two writers overlap in wall-clock time.
|
||||
await client.Entered.WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
|
||||
var asks = Enumerable.Range(0, 6)
|
||||
.Select(_ => actor.Ask<UpsertSiteCallReply>(
|
||||
new UpsertSiteCallCommand(NewRow(TrackedOperationId.New(), siteId)),
|
||||
TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)))
|
||||
.ToArray();
|
||||
var asks = Enumerable.Range(0, 6)
|
||||
.Select(_ => actor.Ask<UpsertSiteCallReply>(
|
||||
new UpsertSiteCallCommand(NewRow(TrackedOperationId.New(), siteId)),
|
||||
TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)))
|
||||
.ToArray();
|
||||
|
||||
await Task.WhenAll(asks);
|
||||
Assert.All(asks, ask => Assert.True(ask.Result.Accepted));
|
||||
await Task.WhenAll(asks);
|
||||
Assert.All(asks, ask => Assert.True(ask.Result.Accepted));
|
||||
|
||||
// The drain's own upserts must have run in the same window.
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.UpsertCount >= 12, $"expected both writers to have run; saw {repo.UpsertCount}"),
|
||||
TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
// The drain's own upserts must have run in the same window.
|
||||
AwaitAssert(
|
||||
() => Assert.True(repo.UpsertCount >= 12, $"expected both writers to have run; saw {repo.UpsertCount}"),
|
||||
TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
|
||||
Assert.Equal(1, repo.MaxObservedConcurrency);
|
||||
Assert.Equal(1, repo.MaxObservedConcurrency);
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
StopTicker(actor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user