docs: MES-reportable alarm flag — component docs, CLAUDE.md, register rows 121–122
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y5ef34iUUMjmwnMpL9xgmB
This commit is contained in:
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ try {
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Key design decisions — ALL DECIDED 2026-08-01 (design review with user)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`IsFlaggedForMES` for native alarms — DECIDED: severity band.** MES relevance is encoded in the alarm severity itself: MES-relevant alarms are configured (in the Galaxy alarm priority) into a **dedicated band 900–999** reserved exclusively for MES-relevant alarms, so it cannot collide with ordinary criticality tuning. Scripts carry `MesBandMin = 900` / `MesBandMax = 999` as named constants; `IsFlaggedForMES = (Severity in band)` is reported honestly per row; `SimpleAlarmStatus` (always flagged-only) and `AlarmStatus` with `FlaggedOnly=true` filter by the band predicate. Since `Severity` is returned verbatim, MES's own `MinSeverity`/`MaxSeverity` filters compose naturally with the band. No new tables, code flags, or allow-lists. **Operational prerequisite:** the Galaxy alarm priorities for MES-relevant CvdReactor alarms must be set into 900–999 before the endpoints are meaningful.
|
||||
1. **Superseded for COMPUTED alarms 2026-09-11** by `2026-09-11-mes-reportable-alarm-flag-design.md` — still the rule for native alarms. **`IsFlaggedForMES` for native alarms — DECIDED: severity band.** MES relevance is encoded in the alarm severity itself: MES-relevant alarms are configured (in the Galaxy alarm priority) into a **dedicated band 900–999** reserved exclusively for MES-relevant alarms, so it cannot collide with ordinary criticality tuning. Scripts carry `MesBandMin = 900` / `MesBandMax = 999` as named constants; `IsFlaggedForMES = (Severity in band)` is reported honestly per row; `SimpleAlarmStatus` (always flagged-only) and `AlarmStatus` with `FlaggedOnly=true` filter by the band predicate. Since `Severity` is returned verbatim, MES's own `MinSeverity`/`MaxSeverity` filters compose naturally with the band. No new tables, code flags, or allow-lists. **Operational prerequisite:** the Galaxy alarm priorities for MES-relevant CvdReactor alarms must be set into 900–999 before the endpoints are meaningful.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **MESReceiver version — DECIDED: dropped entirely.** With no native alarm sources there is no live state; a config-only catalog answer was judged not worth shipping. Only CvdReactor implements the scripts; other machines get the router's clean "not supported on machine" error (§5.1). No BTDB `MachineAlarm` dependency remains.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ All 7 fix-now items landed via PLAN-04/05/06/07/08 (verified in review 08 round
|
||||
| 68 | ~~**`deploy.sh` run from a git worktree silently rehomes every node's bind-mount data dir**~~ **RESOLVED 2026-08-15 (guard added in the same close-out).** The compose files' bind mounts are relative (`./site-a-node-a/data`), so a deploy from a worktree checkout mounts the worktree's copies — the rig keeps running and looks healthy, but its SQLite stores split from the main checkout's and everything written there is orphaned by the next deploy from main. Bit the rows-46–53 close-out live: the seeding agent's `rig-probe-1` deploy persisted into worktree-homed dirs and "vanished" after the orchestrator's redeploy (no tombstone, no product bug — LWW/tombstone forensics ruled out deletion; the row sat in `.claude/worktrees/…/docker/site-a-node-a/data/site-localdb.db` the whole time). Both `docker/deploy.sh` and `docker-env2/deploy.sh` now refuse to run from a `.claude/worktrees/` path (override: `SCADABRIDGE_ALLOW_WORKTREE_DEPLOY=1`). | Found during the rows-46–53 close-out | Closed 2026-08-15. | — |
|
||||
| 119 | **Port the QA/prod MES receiver scripts onto the reset-aware `WriteBatchAndWaitAsync` overload (Gitea #36)** *(Medium)*. Template scripts CvdReactor MesMoveIn (13) / MesMoveOut (14) / MesSampleData (36) and base MESReceiver MoveIn/MoveOut (15, 16, 25, 26, 37, 38) still reset `<X>CompleteFlag` with a plain write and rely on `Task.Delay(1000)`; QA carries a config-only `WaitAsync(false, 10 s)` patch on 13/14 (deployment record 110). Rewrite: `var hs = await rx.Attributes.WriteBatchAndWaitAsync(values, "<X>Flag", true, "<X>CompleteFlag", true, 25 s, "<X>CompleteFlag", false, 10 s); if (!hs.Matched) return new { WasSuccessful=false, ErrorText = hs.ResetFailed ? "Timeout waiting for <X>CompleteFlag to reset" : "Timeout waiting for <X> to complete", BatchID=0 };` and delete the delay. Requires the #36 build on the target central + sites first (the overload does not exist on older sites → deploy-gate compile failure, by design). | Gitea #36, design `2026-09-10-handshake-reset-echo-design.md` §8 | Repo-only scope was the user's decision for the #36 session; the script bodies live only in the QA/prod databases. | Next QA deployment of a build ≥ this change (write a deployment record; then prod). |
|
||||
| 120 | **Data-sourced SCALAR writes reach the OPC UA server as String Variants — every non-String node rejects them with BadTypeMismatch (0x80740000)** *(Medium)*. `InstanceActor.HandleSetDataAttribute` / `HandleWriteAttributeBatch` decode only List values before the DCL write ("Scalars are unchanged"), so the codec-encoded string (`"True"`, `"42.5"`) reaches `RealOpcUaClient.WriteValuesAsync`, which wraps it in `new Variant(value)` — a String variant sent to a Boolean/Double node. Found live 2026-09-10 running `docker/seed-handshake-demo.sh` against opc-plc `Motor.Running`/`Pump.Running`/`Motor.Speed` (`SetAttribute('Complete') failed: OPC UA write failed with status: 0x80740000`); the seed was retargeted onto the rig's only two writable String nodes. The MxGateway path is unaffected in practice: prod's Delmia/MES handshakes write the same strings through the gateway today. Fix candidates: (a) decode scalars by declared `DataType` in the InstanceActor before the DCL write — also changes what MxGateway receives, so it needs a gateway-side compatibility check; (b) adapter-local: `RealOpcUaClient` coerces to the node's DataType (it already resolves `DataTypeIds` in `EnrichVariableTypeInfoAsync`), leaving the MxGateway wire untouched — preferred. Pin with a `RealOpcUaClientArrayWriteTests`-style test for a Boolean scalar. | Found live 2026-09-10 during the #36 rig gate | Out of scope for #36 (handshake ordering); touches the production write path and needs the MxGateway compatibility question answered first. | Before any OPC UA-bound template relies on script writes to non-String nodes (none does today — until this gate the rig's script writes to OPC UA were static-only). |
|
||||
| 121 | **No source-level `IsMesReportable` on native alarm source bindings** *(Low)*. `TemplateNativeAlarmSource` / `InstanceNativeAlarmSourceOverride` carry no per-alarm MES-relevance flag — "every condition under this binding is reportable" is not expressible, only the 900–999 severity-band convention. | `docs/plans/2026-09-11-mes-reportable-alarm-flag-design.md` | Native alarms have no per-alarm config row, and the design chose not to invent one for this slice. | A native-source machine needs per-alarm MES relevance beyond the severity band. |
|
||||
| 122 | **`IsMesReportable` does not ride the wire** *(Low)*. `AlarmStateUpdate` (vendored proto) and `DebugAlarmStateDto` have no `IsMesReportable` field, so central-side surfaces (Debug View live stream, Alarm Summary) always see `false` even though the site-side snapshot stamps the real value. Adding it is additive-only: `AlarmStateUpdate` field 25, `DebugAlarmStateDto` field 20, via a manual `regen-proto.sh` toggle-build-copy-untoggle. | `docs/plans/2026-09-11-mes-reportable-alarm-flag-design.md` | No consumer needed it in this slice — the flag exists to serve `Alarms.MesReportableAsync()` for scripts, not a central UI surface. | Operators ask to see the MES-reportable flag live on Debug View / Alarm Summary. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Resolved (verified against the code 2026-07-10)
|
||||
Rows removed from the Deferred table above once confirmed shipped. Kept here for traceability.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# MES-Reportable Alarm Flag — Design
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-09-11
|
||||
**Status:** DRAFT — awaiting user review. Nothing implemented; nothing committed.
|
||||
**Status:** IMPLEMENTED 2026-09-11 (rig gate pending — see §8 once Task 14 lands).
|
||||
**Supersedes (partially):** the severity-band decision in
|
||||
[`2026-06-30-mes-alarm-status-api.md`](2026-06-30-mes-alarm-status-api.md) §6.1 for **computed**
|
||||
alarms only (native alarms keep the band — see §2.3).
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user