docs(notifications): record EWS live-gate PASS (rig -> on-prem Exchange, Delivered first attempt)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# EWS Email Transport for the Notification Outbox — Design
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-08-10 · **Status:** Implemented on `feature/ews-email-transport`; manual live gate pending · **Owner decisions captured below.**
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-08-10 · **Status:** Implemented, merged to main; **live gate PASS 2026-08-10** · **Owner decisions captured below.**
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Context — the pending task this supersedes
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -161,6 +161,19 @@ call (~200 lines including classification).
|
||||
- `docs/test_infra/test_infra_smtp.md`: note that the OAuth2 gap is superseded by EWS for
|
||||
on-prem deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
### Live gate result (2026-08-10) — PASS
|
||||
Run on the docker rig, rebuilt from main with the EWS image. The EWS configuration was created
|
||||
through the new Central UI transport selector (its own first live exercise), pointing at the
|
||||
real on-prem endpoint with the dev service mailbox. One SoakNotify tick was enabled for ~9 s;
|
||||
the resulting notification delivered on the **first attempt** (`Status=Delivered`,
|
||||
`RetryCount=0`, resolved target = the tester's real mailbox) through
|
||||
`https://webmail.zimmer.com/ews/exchange.asmx`, and the message was received. Pre-existing
|
||||
parked rows (from the no-config era) were untouched. The rig was then restored to baseline:
|
||||
SMTP config row removed, notification list recipient restored, soak instance disabled.
|
||||
Note: the rig's LDAP login was found broken by the SEC-36 GLAuth service-account rotation
|
||||
(stale `serviceaccount123` in docker-compose); the gate ran under the Development-only
|
||||
`DisableLogin` switch, left active pending the rotated credential.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Explicitly out of scope
|
||||
- Removing the SMTP/OAuth2 path (stays config-selectable; Approach "additional transport" was
|
||||
the owner's choice).
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user