test(secrets): live gate for the gRPC secrets hub — 3/4 PASS, not merged

Rig config enabling the pull-only hub on the docker cluster (central pair hosts,
site-a pair follows; site-b and site-c deliberately left off so the default-OFF
posture is proven side by side), plus the gate record.

Checks 1-3 PASS. A central write reaches both site-a nodes in 5 s with a
byte-identical ciphertext row and decrypts correctly on both; a site pair boots
and serves its full last-known-good store with the entire central pair stopped,
warning once per interval without crashing, and resumes convergence unaided when
central returns; a tombstone propagates in under 9 s and survives a pair restart
with central up and sweeping, without resurrecting.

Check 4 FAILS one clause of three. Both auth negatives - absent bearer and wrong
bearer - are denied with a byte-identical Unauthenticated status and detail, and
a fleet-wide grep of all eight nodes' docker logs and on-disk Serilog files finds
ZERO occurrences of the dev token, the dev KEK or either plaintext. But the
criterion also asks for a server-side WARNING on denial, and there is none: the
only record is one Information line per call from Grpc.AspNetCore.Server, because
SecretsHubAuthInterceptor deliberately logs nothing on a denial and warns only
when no token is configured at all. That is a property of the 0.4.0 library, not
of this branch, and it is not patched here - a host-side interceptor would
contradict a documented library decision at the wrong layer and put an unbounded
log write on an unauthenticated endpoint.

The merge condition is 4/4, so this branch is NOT merged. The library's denial
logging is the only thing between this result and a merge.

Two residuals worth carrying: the hub client dials a single endpoint and does not
fail over (observed live, and contrasted against CentralGrpcEndpoints failing over
on the same node in the same minute), and the central pair does not converge with
itself - central-b answered an authenticated GetManifest with an empty manifest
for the whole run while central-a held both secrets. Together those make "which
central node is authoritative for secrets" one question, not two.

Rig config notes: Secrets__SqlitePath points at /app/data because the appsettings
default resolves to /app inside the image's writable layer, so the central pair
gained the per-node data volume the site pairs already had. All values are
dev-only and committed under the same exception the mesh PSKs already use.

Also recorded: a gate-METHOD defect. Seeding the bind-mounted store from the macOS
host is not coherent with the running container - the row was visible to the host
and to a fresh container but never to the node, and was lost outright on restart.
Every store access was redone from a throwaway container. The failure mode is a
convincing false negative that looks exactly like a broken hub.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014WNM4vjoVksyyBraTXSZE1
This commit is contained in:
Joseph Doherty
2026-08-07 08:01:55 -04:00
parent fc784b4137
commit 9d5cf7100e
2 changed files with 403 additions and 0 deletions
+64
View File
@@ -1,3 +1,47 @@
# ── Clustered secret replication: the pull-only gRPC hub (scadaproj#3) ─────────
#
# Central hosts the hub on its EXISTING h2c control-plane listener (CentralGrpcPort
# 8083, alongside CentralControlService); each site node sweeps it on an interval and
# writes what it pulls into its OWN local SQLite store. Nothing but ciphertext crosses
# the wire, so every participating node must resolve the SAME KEK.
#
# ENABLED ON FOUR NODES ONLY: the central pair (hub) and the site-a pair (followers).
# site-b and site-c are deliberately left without it, so the default-OFF posture is
# proven side by side on one rig — exactly as site-a is the rig's only LocalDb-replicated
# pair. A node with no Secrets__* override keeps the shipped appsettings default
# (Replication:Enabled=false, Mode=SqlServer) and composes a plain local store.
#
# ALL VALUES HERE ARE DEV-ONLY and committed under the same exception as the mesh PSKs
# and the ApiKeyPepper above: a local docker rig needs a working credential in source
# control to boot. Production supplies the KEK out of band (ZB_SECRETS_MASTER_KEY, never
# committed) and the hub token from appsettings/env — NEVER as a ${secret:} reference,
# since resolving one is what the hub exists to make possible.
x-secrets-hub-env: &secrets-hub-env
# DEV-ONLY KEK — NOT a real key. Identical on all four participating nodes: only
# ciphertext replicates, so a node with a different KEK fails closed on resolve with a
# kek_id mismatch that reads like corruption but is a deployment error.
ZB_SECRETS_MASTER_KEY: "zZiBWuoaVMbJmGXToLk9Lakw0iJozXoL/7Gxac3GwJ4="
# The appsettings default is the relative "scadabridge-secrets.db", which resolves to
# /app — inside the image's writable layer, so it is destroyed by any container
# recreate and unreachable from the host. /app/data is the node's own mounted volume
# (the one LocalDb already uses on sites; added to the central pair for this).
Secrets__SqlitePath: "/app/data/scadabridge-secrets.db"
Secrets__Replication__Enabled: "true"
Secrets__Replication__Mode: "Grpc"
# DEV-ONLY shared bearer token — NOT a real secret. Presented by every follower and
# verified by the hub's fail-closed SecretsHubAuthInterceptor. Must be IDENTICAL on the
# hub and every follower; an unset token is a startup failure on both halves.
Secrets__GrpcHub__BearerToken: "secrets-hub-docker-dev-token"
# Site half of the same section. NOTE the asymmetry with
# ScadaBridge:Communication:CentralGrpcEndpoints, which is a LIST that fails over across
# the central pair: the hub client dials a SINGLE endpoint, so a sweep against a stopped
# central-a stalls rather than failing over to central-b. That is survivable — the sweep
# is best-effort and the node keeps serving its full local last-known-good store — but
# secrets stop converging until central-a returns.
x-secrets-hub-site-env: &secrets-hub-site-env
Secrets__GrpcHub__Endpoint: "http://scadabridge-central-a:8083"
services:
central-a:
image: scadabridge:latest
@@ -7,6 +51,8 @@ services:
stop_grace_period: 30s
container_name: scadabridge-central-a
environment:
# Hub half of the pull-only gRPC secrets hub (anchor at the top of this file).
<<: *secrets-hub-env
SCADABRIDGE_CONFIG: Central
ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT: Development
ASPNETCORE_URLS: "http://+:5000"
@@ -42,6 +88,11 @@ services:
- "9013:8083" # gRPC control plane (CentralControlService, T1A.2)
volumes:
- ./central-node-a/appsettings.Central.json:/app/appsettings.Central.json:ro
# Added for the gRPC secrets hub: the node's local secret store lives at
# Secrets__SqlitePath=/app/data/scadabridge-secrets.db, so it needs the same
# per-node volume the site nodes already have. Without it the store sits in the
# image's writable layer and is destroyed by every container recreate.
- ./central-node-a/data:/app/data
- ./central-node-a/logs:/app/logs
networks:
- scadabridge-net
@@ -55,6 +106,8 @@ services:
stop_grace_period: 30s
container_name: scadabridge-central-b
environment:
# Hub half of the pull-only gRPC secrets hub (anchor at the top of this file).
<<: *secrets-hub-env
SCADABRIDGE_CONFIG: Central
ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT: Development
ASPNETCORE_URLS: "http://+:5000"
@@ -90,6 +143,11 @@ services:
- "9014:8083" # gRPC control plane (CentralControlService, T1A.2)
volumes:
- ./central-node-b/appsettings.Central.json:/app/appsettings.Central.json:ro
# Added for the gRPC secrets hub: the node's local secret store lives at
# Secrets__SqlitePath=/app/data/scadabridge-secrets.db, so it needs the same
# per-node volume the site nodes already have. Without it the store sits in the
# image's writable layer and is destroyed by every container recreate.
- ./central-node-b/data:/app/data
- ./central-node-b/logs:/app/logs
networks:
- scadabridge-net
@@ -103,6 +161,9 @@ services:
stop_grace_period: 30s
container_name: scadabridge-site-a-a
environment:
# Follower half of the pull-only gRPC secrets hub (anchors at the top of this
# file). site-b and site-c deliberately carry neither.
<<: [*secrets-hub-env, *secrets-hub-site-env]
SCADABRIDGE_CONFIG: Site
ports:
- "9021:8082" # Akka remoting (host access for debugging)
@@ -123,6 +184,9 @@ services:
stop_grace_period: 30s
container_name: scadabridge-site-a-b
environment:
# Follower half of the pull-only gRPC secrets hub (anchors at the top of this
# file). site-b and site-c deliberately carry neither.
<<: [*secrets-hub-env, *secrets-hub-site-env]
SCADABRIDGE_CONFIG: Site
ports:
- "9022:8082" # Akka remoting
@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
# Secrets gRPC hub — live gate on the docker cluster
**Result: 3 of 4 checks PASS. Check 4 FAILS one clause of its stated criterion.**
**NOT MERGED** — the gate's merge condition is 4/4. Run 2026-08-07 on the local 8-node
docker cluster.
## Purpose
Terminal gate (Task 7) for `feat/secrets-grpc-hub`, which wires
`ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Replicator.Grpc` 0.4.0 into ScadaBridge: the central role hosts a
**pull-only** `secrets_hub.v1` gRPC hub on its existing h2c control-plane listener, and a
site node runs a sweep that converges its **own local SQLite store** from that hub.
This is the ScadaBridge half of the production-topology decision in
[scadaproj#3](https://gitea.dohertylan.com/dohertj2/scadaproj/issues/3) (design:
`scadaproj/docs/plans/2026-08-07-secrets-production-topology-and-grpc-hub.md`). The
SqlServer replicator is not the production path here: it requires every site node to hold a
connection string to central's database, which breaks ScadaBridge's standing rule that
sites talk to central, not to central's DB.
**Scope: rig config only.** No product code was changed by this gate — see
[Defects](#defects-found).
## Rig state
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| Repo / branch | `ScadaBridge` @ `feat/secrets-grpc-hub` |
| Git SHA gated | `fc784b413713b1643a21d573e55c00bcc05bd8ee` (`fc784b41`) |
| Image | `scadabridge:latest` = `2958aa2c2bbb`, built 2026-08-07 11:39 UTC |
| `ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.Host.dll` | `09cf76dc550d32fe…`**byte-identical on all 8 nodes** |
| Secrets libs | `ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets*` **0.4.0** (`Directory.Packages.props`) |
| Working tree at build | only `docker/docker-compose.yml` modified (rig config, not in the image) + untracked `.claude/` |
| Hub enabled on | `central-a`, `central-b` (host) and `site-a-a`, `site-a-b` (followers) |
| Hub NOT enabled on | `site-b-a`, `site-b-b`, `site-c-a`, `site-c-b` — no `Secrets__*` env, no store file, no hub/sweep log line (verified) |
| Sweep interval | `00:00:30` — the **product default**, deliberately not shortened, so the timings below are real |
| KEK | one shared committed **dev-only** key, identical on all four (`kek_id` sha256 `7451bcbc1f1f` on every row observed) |
`site-b` and `site-c` were left off on purpose: the default-OFF posture is proven side by
side on one rig, the same way `site-a` is the rig's only LocalDb-replicated pair.
### Rig-config change made by this gate
`docker/docker-compose.yml` gained two YAML anchors and applied them to four services:
- `x-secrets-hub-env` (central pair + site-a pair) — dev KEK, `Secrets__SqlitePath`,
`Secrets__Replication__Enabled=true`, `Secrets__Replication__Mode=Grpc`,
`Secrets__GrpcHub__BearerToken`.
- `x-secrets-hub-site-env` (site-a pair only) —
`Secrets__GrpcHub__Endpoint=http://scadabridge-central-a:8083`.
All values are DEV-ONLY and committed under the same exception the mesh PSKs and
`InboundApi:ApiKeyPepper` already use. `Secrets__SqlitePath` points at `/app/data` because
the appsettings default is a relative path resolving to `/app` — inside the image's
writable layer, destroyed by every container recreate. The **central pair gained a
`./central-node-*/data:/app/data` volume** for this; the site pairs already had one.
## Method
Secrets were seeded, read and deleted with the `ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Cli` (`secret`) published
from `scadaproj/ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets` (0.4.0) and run **in a throwaway container** mounting one
node's `data` volume, with that node's KEK. This is the method the sibling OtOpcUa gate used
the same day (`OtOpcUa/docs/plans/2026-08-07-secrets-pair-local-live-gate.md`).
The CentralUI `/admin/secrets` page was **not** used, and for this topology that costs
nothing: the hub is a pure reader of central's store on every call, with no write-triggered
path and no manifest cache. A row written by any process into central's store is on exactly
the same path a row written through the page would be. (Contrast the Akka replicator, where
the two differ — hence that gate's residual 1, which does not apply here.)
Ciphertext identity is evidenced as a **SHA-256 over the encrypted columns only**
(`ciphertext‖nonce‖tag‖wrapped_dek‖wrap_nonce‖wrap_tag`), plus a hash of `kek_id`. No
plaintext, no token and no key material appears in this document. The secret values used
were throwaway smoke strings.
gRPC calls for check 4 were made with `fullstorydev/grpcurl` on the `scadabridge-net`
network, against the committed `secrets_hub.proto`.
## Results
| # | Check | Result | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Convergence — central write reaches both site-a nodes, byte-identical, decrypt-verified | **PASS** | **5 s** (budget 30 s + margin) |
| 2 | Cold-boot offline — site pair boots and serves last-known-good with central down; convergence resumes | **PASS** | resumed in **14 s** / **43 s** |
| 3 | Tombstone — delete propagates, survives a pair restart | **PASS** | **≤ 9 s** |
| 4 | Auth negatives + log hygiene | **FAIL** (1 clause of 3) | — |
Baseline before seeding: all four stores empty.
### Check 1 — convergence · PASS
Seeded `hub-gate-smoke-1` on **`central-a` only** at 11:46:57Z.
```
central-node-a hub-gate-smoke-1 rev=0 del=0 cipher_sha256=00a14a2eb8de987fb75a4515 kek=7451bcbc1f1f updated=2026-08-07T11:46:57.1403922+00:00
site-a-node-a hub-gate-smoke-1 rev=0 del=0 cipher_sha256=00a14a2eb8de987fb75a4515 kek=7451bcbc1f1f updated=2026-08-07T11:46:57.1403922+00:00
site-a-node-b hub-gate-smoke-1 rev=0 del=0 cipher_sha256=00a14a2eb8de987fb75a4515 kek=7451bcbc1f1f updated=2026-08-07T11:46:57.1403922+00:00
```
Ciphertext hash, `kek_id`, `revision` and `updated_utc` are **identical on all three** — the
row is relayed verbatim, not re-encrypted, so the last-writer-wins ordering key survives the
hop. First poll after the seed (11:47:05Z) already showed both followers converged.
Both halves logged it, and central served the fetch:
```
site-a-a [11:47:02 INF] Secret hub sync converged: pulled 1 row(s) from the central hub.
site-a-b [11:47:02 INF] Secret hub sync converged: pulled 1 row(s) from the central hub.
central-a [11:47:02 INF] Request finished HTTP/2 POST .../SecretsHub/GetSecrets - 200 application/grpc 0.9899ms
```
**Convergence = 11:46:57Z → 11:47:02Z = 5 s**, one sweep tick.
**Decrypt-verified on both followers**: `secret get hub-gate-smoke-1` returned the exact
plaintext seeded on central-a, on `site-a-a` and `site-a-b`.
### Check 2 — cold-boot offline · PASS
Central pair stopped 11:48:27Z → 11:48:37Z.
**Sweep degrades, does not crash.** One warning per interval on each follower, carrying the
transport fault and nothing else:
```
site-a-a [11:49:02 WRN] Secret hub sync failed; the node continues serving its local store and will retry on the next interval.
Grpc.Core.RpcException: Status(StatusCode="Unavailable", Detail="Error connecting to subchannel." …)
```
**Site pair restarted together** (the supported pattern) 11:49:31Z → 11:50:12Z, with central
still down. `site-a-a` booted at 11:49:42Z; its `SyncOnStartup` sweep warned at 11:49:42Z and
retried at 11:50:12 / 11:50:42 / 11:51:12 / 11:51:42 / 11:52:12 / 11:52:42. Both containers
`running`, `RestartCount=0`, **zero** `FATAL` / `Unhandled exception` /
`Application startup exception` lines.
**Last-known-good served with central down** — at 11:51:08Z, `secret get hub-gate-smoke-1`
returned the correct plaintext on **both** `site-a-a` and `site-a-b`.
Central pair started 11:51:37Z. `hub-gate-smoke-2` seeded on central-a at 11:52:29Z — **after
the site nodes were already up**, so this proves convergence *resumed* rather than
re-bootstrapped:
```
site-a-b [11:52:43 INF] Secret hub sync converged: pulled 1 row(s) from the central hub. → 14 s
site-a-a [11:53:12 INF] Secret hub sync converged: pulled 1 row(s) from the central hub. → 43 s
```
Both rows byte-identical to central's (`cipher_sha256=4f022e222cfc2f8f77dcfb0b`,
`updated=2026-08-07T11:52:29.6983529+00:00`).
**Honest note on the 43 s.** `site-a-a`'s first post-outage sweep (11:52:42Z) *still* failed,
with `SocketException: Name or service not known` — a stale DNS/subchannel view of a
container that had been `docker stop`ped and `docker start`ed. It recovered unaided on the
very next tick. So after a central outage, worst-case convergence on this rig is **two**
sweep intervals, not one. Bounded, self-healing, no intervention — but recorded so the 5 s
figure from check 1 is not read as the post-outage number.
### Check 3 — tombstone · PASS
`hub-gate-smoke-1` deleted on central-a at 11:54:05Z. `hub-gate-smoke-2` left live as a
control.
```
central-node-a hub-gate-smoke-1 rev=1 del=1 updated=2026-08-07T11:54:05.9812744+00:00 deleted=2026-08-07T11:54:05.9812744+00:00
site-a-node-a hub-gate-smoke-1 rev=1 del=1 updated=2026-08-07T11:54:05.9812744+00:00 deleted=2026-08-07T11:54:05.9812744+00:00
site-a-node-b hub-gate-smoke-1 rev=1 del=1 updated=2026-08-07T11:54:05.9812744+00:00 deleted=2026-08-07T11:54:05.9812744+00:00
```
Both followers held the tombstone at the 11:54:14Z poll — **≤ 9 s**. Delete is a soft
tombstone (`is_deleted=1`, `revision` bumped, `updated_utc` restamped), which is what lets it
win under last-writer-wins. `secret get` returned `{"error":"not-found"}` and `secret list`
returned only `hub-gate-smoke-2` on both followers.
**No resurrection across a pair restart.** Site pair restarted together 11:55:09Z →
11:55:50Z, **with central up and sweeping the whole time** — so the sweep had every
opportunity to re-pull the row. Re-checked at 11:57:05Z (75 s / 2+ sweeps later):
- `hub-gate-smoke-1` still `rev=1 del=1` on both, `updated_utc` unchanged;
`secret get``{"error":"not-found"}` on both.
- `hub-gate-smoke-2` survived on both and **decrypted to the correct plaintext** on both.
### Check 4 — auth negatives + log hygiene · FAIL (one clause)
Three calls to `SecretsHub/GetManifest` on `scadabridge-central-a:8083` at 11:57:3132Z:
| Call | Result |
|---|---|
| **no** `authorization` header | `Code: Unauthenticated` / `Message: Unauthenticated.` |
| **wrong** bearer (`Bearer not-the-hub-token`) | `Code: Unauthenticated` / `Message: Unauthenticated.` |
| correct bearer (positive control) | `200`, manifest returned (2 entries) |
**PASS — identical denial.** Both negatives are byte-identical in code and detail: a caller
learns it was refused and nothing else. The positive control proves the endpoint is live and
the refusals are the auth gate, not a dead route.
**PASS — log hygiene, zero hits.** Every one of the **8** nodes' `docker logs` *and* every
on-disk Serilog file under `docker/*/logs/` was grepped for the dev bearer token value, the
dev KEK value, and both secret plaintexts:
```
central-a token=0 kek=0 plain1=0 plain2=0 authz-header-mentions=0
central-b token=0 kek=0 plain1=0 plain2=0 authz-header-mentions=0
site-a-a token=0 kek=0 plain1=0 plain2=0 authz-header-mentions=0
site-a-b token=0 kek=0 plain1=0 plain2=0 authz-header-mentions=0
site-b-a / site-b-b / site-c-a / site-c-b all zero
on-disk log files: zero matching files for all four search strings
```
The token appears only where it legitimately may: the committed rig config
(`docker/docker-compose.yml`) and the resulting container environment.
**FAIL — no server-side *warning*.** The criterion asks for a server-side warning on denial.
What the hub actually emits is one **Information**-level line per denial, from
`Grpc.AspNetCore.Server`, not from the hub's own gate:
```
[11:57:31 INF] Error status code 'Unauthenticated' with detail 'Unauthenticated.' raised.
[11:57:32 INF] Error status code 'Unauthenticated' with detail 'Unauthenticated.' raised.
```
Nothing at `WRN` or above was emitted by either denial — verified by dumping **every** log
line in the 11:57:3132Z window, not by a filtered grep.
This is **not a wiring mistake and not fixable in this repo**: `SecretsHubAuthInterceptor`
(in `ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Replicator.Grpc` 0.4.0) deliberately logs *nothing* on a denial. Its
only warning is `WarnUnconfiguredOnce`, emitted once when the hub has **no token configured
at all** — which is not the case here. So the shipped design and this gate's criterion
disagree, and the disagreement lives in the library.
The consequence is real but narrow: a follower whose token was mis-rotated is refused on
every sweep and **stops converging**, while central records that only at Information. An
operator watching for warnings sees the follower's own `Secret hub sync failed` WRN (which
does fire), but central shows nothing above INF.
**Not patched in ScadaBridge.** A host-side interceptor could log the denial, but that would
(a) contradict a decision the library documents and reasons about explicitly, in the
consumer rather than at the layer that owns it, and (b) put an unbounded log write on an
unauthenticated endpoint. Both are worse than the gap. The correct fix is a rate-limited
warning in `SecretsHubAuthInterceptor`, or an explicit decision that Information is right
and this criterion should be relaxed. That call is not this gate's to make — see
[Follow-ups](#follow-ups).
## Defects found
**None in product code.** One defect in the *gate method*, caught and corrected before any
result was recorded:
**Host-side seeding of a bind-mounted SQLite store is not coherent with the running
container** (Docker Desktop for macOS). The first attempt at check 1 seeded central-a's
store with the CLI running natively on the host. The row was visible to the host and to a
fresh helper container, but the **running node never saw it**: four consecutive sweeps
returned an empty manifest, no `GetSecrets` was ever issued, and a `wal_checkpoint(TRUNCATE)`
did not help. Restarting central-a then **lost the row entirely** — it was gone from both the
host and container views. Cause is the virtiofs/page-cache boundary between the macOS host
and the Linux guest: SQLite's WAL and `-shm` mappings are not shared across it.
Corrected by doing **every** store access — seed, read, delete — from a throwaway container
on the same guest kernel, which is what the sibling OtOpcUa gate already did. The rig was
returned to an empty-store baseline before check 1 was re-run. Recorded because the failure
mode is a convincing false negative: it looks exactly like "the hub is broken".
## Residuals
1. **The hub client dials a SINGLE endpoint — no failover.** Known and documented on the
branch. Observed live and directly contrasted on the same node in the same minute:
```
site-a-a [11:51:13 WRN] Central control-plane endpoint http://scadabridge-central-a:8083 is
unavailable; site site-a failed over to http://scadabridge-central-b:8083.
site-a-a [11:51:12 WRN] Secret hub sync failed; the node continues serving its local store …
```
`ScadaBridge:Communication:CentralGrpcEndpoints` is a list and failed over; the hub client
stalled. Survivable — the sweep is best-effort and the node keeps its full local
last-known-good store — but secrets stop converging until that one central node returns.
2. **The central pair does NOT converge with itself, and this makes residual 1 sharper than
it reads.** Both central nodes host the hub (verified: `central-b` answers, and refuses an
unauthenticated call identically). But `central-b`'s store stayed **empty** for the whole
run while `central-a` held both secrets:
```
central-b, correct bearer, 11:59:32Z: {} ← empty manifest, authenticated
central-node-b (store): (empty)
```
Nothing replicates central-a ↔ central-b in `Mode=Grpc` — the topology is pull-only
*central → sites*. So a hypothetical failover to `central-b` would not merely stall, it
would succeed against an empty hub. By the reconciler's pull-only algorithm that is not
data loss (a name absent from the manifest is simply not pulled, never deleted), but it
*is* a silent stop to convergence, and a deployment that authors a secret on the central
node the sites do **not** dial will see it reach nobody. **Not live-tested here** —
asserted from the algorithm plus the observed empty manifest. Any production enablement
needs an answer for how the central pair itself converges.
3. **Both site-a nodes dial the same central node.** Not a rig shortcut — it is the only
shape the client supports (residual 1). Worth restating so the run is not read as having
exercised two independent hub sources.
4. **The `/admin/secrets` write path was not exercised.** Seeding was CLI-into-central's-store.
For this topology that is the same path (see [Method](#method)), so it is a coverage note,
not a gap in the result — but the page's own Blazor/authz behaviour is unproven by this
gate. `ScadaBridge#22` covered it separately.
5. **Delete-while-a-follower-is-offline was not tested.** Check 3 restarts the pair *after*
both already held the tombstone. The harder resurrection case — deleting at central while
a follower is down, then bringing it back holding a live copy — is covered by the
library's last-writer-wins tests but not live here. Under a pull-only hub it is
structurally safer than in a bidirectional topology (the follower can never push its stale
live row back), which is why it was not prioritised.
6. **Replication stays default-OFF in the product.** `Secrets:Replication:Enabled` is `false`
and `Mode` is `SqlServer` in the shipped `appsettings.json`. It is enabled on this docker
rig only, on four of eight nodes, with a dev KEK and a dev token. Production enablement
additionally needs a real KEK supplied out of band and a real token — never committed, and
never a `${secret:}` reference.
## Follow-ups
- **File against `ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Replicator.Grpc`:** decide whether a denied hub call
should emit a rate-limited `Warning` on the server. Today it emits nothing from the gate
itself, so a mis-rotated follower token is visible at central only at Information level.
This is the sole reason this gate is not 4/4.
- **File against ScadaBridge:** endpoint failover for the hub client, and/or a documented
answer for how the central pair's own stores converge (residual 2). Both are the same
underlying question — "which central node is authoritative for secrets".
## Conclusion
The pull-only gRPC secrets hub **works, and works the way the branch says it does**:
convergence is one sweep tick, ciphertext is relayed verbatim so last-writer-wins ordering
survives the hop, a site node boots and serves its full last-known-good store with the entire
central pair stopped, convergence resumes unaided when central returns, tombstones propagate
and do not resurrect across a pair restart, the auth gate refuses uniformly, and no token,
KEK or plaintext reaches any log on any of the eight nodes.
One clause of check 4 is not met — denials are recorded at Information, not Warning — and
that clause is a property of the library, not of this branch. The gate's merge condition is
4/4, so **this branch is not merged by this gate**. Resolving the logging question (fix the
library, or relax the criterion) is the only thing standing between this result and a merge.