refactor(comm): retire ClusterClient naming after the gRPC cutover
Phase 4 of the ClusterClient -> gRPC migration deleted the Akka transports but left the naming behind: `ClusterClientSiteAuditClient` was transport- agnostic and worked unchanged, so it survived the deletion under a name that now describes a transport the repo no longer has. Same for a scatter of doc-comments still framing gRPC as "the new transport" beside an Akka one that is gone. Renames it to `SiteCommunicationAuditClient` (and its test file) and rewrites the stale comments to describe the single transport that exists. Also tightens CLAUDE.md: drops the self-describing directory listing and the 27-component enumeration in favour of the non-obvious parts only. Behaviour-neutral: names and prose only. Recorded as the Phase 4 follow-up in docs/plans/2026-07-22-clusterclient-to-grpc-plan.md.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ namespace ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.Communication.Grpc;
|
||||
/// <para>
|
||||
/// The seven pairs mirror, one for one, the seven messages
|
||||
/// <c>SiteCommunicationActor</c> forwards to <c>/user/central-communication</c> over
|
||||
/// Akka <c>ClusterClient</c> today. Both transports carry the SAME message types
|
||||
/// end-to-end — central's handlers are untouched by the migration — so this mapper is
|
||||
/// the control plane. The in-process and wire representations carry the SAME message types
|
||||
/// end-to-end — central's handlers were untouched by the migration — so this mapper is
|
||||
/// the only place the two representations meet, and a field that does not survive a
|
||||
/// round-trip here is a field the gRPC transport silently drops.
|
||||
/// </para>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user