feat(testrun): route WaitForAttribute in the Test-Run sandbox (deferred #14)
Closes deferred-work register item #14 with full fidelity. The Central UI Test-Run sandbox previously threw ScriptSandboxException for Attributes.WaitAsync/WaitForAsync; now the value-equality forms route to the bound deployed instance over the same cross-site path inbound Route.To().WaitForAttribute() uses. - Commons: additive trailing RouteToWaitForAttributeRequest.RequireGoodQuality (default false; message-evolution safe) so quality-gated waits route too. - SiteRuntime: DeploymentManagerActor's routed-wait handler now threads request.RequireGoodQuality into the InstanceActor WaitForAttributeRequest (previously hard-coded to default). - CentralUI sandbox: ISandboxInstanceGateway.WaitForAttributeAsync + SandboxInstanceGateway impl (via CommunicationService.RouteToWaitForAttributeAsync); SandboxAttributeAccessor value-equality WaitAsync/WaitForAsync route through it (codec-encoded target, scope-resolved name). Predicate overloads stay unsupported (an in-process lambda can't be routed) and throw a clearer, dedicated message. - Tests: sandbox accessor routing + predicate/unbound rejection (CentralUI); site-handler RequireGoodQuality threading (SiteRuntime). Register + the historical waitfor-deferred plan doc updated. Full slnx build 0/0; CentralUI 59, SiteRuntime routed-wait 4, InboundAPI wait 32 green. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MtdgwpEeCUn6cUA5f1LMPj
This commit is contained in:
@@ -551,6 +551,35 @@ public class DeploymentManagerActorTests : TestKit, IDisposable
|
||||
Assert.Equal("Good", response.Quality);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task RouteInboundApiWaitForAttribute_RequireGoodQuality_IsThreadedToInstanceActor()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// #14 (full fidelity): the additive RouteToWaitForAttributeRequest.RequireGoodQuality
|
||||
// flag must reach the InstanceActor's wait. A static attribute is Good quality, so a
|
||||
// quality-gated wait whose target equals the current value still matches — proving the
|
||||
// flag threads through (and does not spuriously reject a Good value).
|
||||
var actor = CreateDeploymentManager();
|
||||
await Task.Delay(500);
|
||||
|
||||
actor.Tell(new DeployInstanceCommand(
|
||||
"dep-wait-gq", "WaitPumpGq", "sha256:wait-gq",
|
||||
MakeConfigJson("WaitPumpGq"), "admin", DateTimeOffset.UtcNow));
|
||||
ExpectMsg<DeploymentStatusResponse>(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
|
||||
await Task.Delay(1000);
|
||||
|
||||
var encodedTarget = AttributeValueCodec.Encode("42");
|
||||
actor.Tell(new RouteToWaitForAttributeRequest(
|
||||
"wait-corr-gq", "WaitPumpGq", "TestAttr", encodedTarget,
|
||||
TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5), DateTimeOffset.UtcNow,
|
||||
ParentExecutionId: null, RequireGoodQuality: true));
|
||||
|
||||
var response = ExpectMsg<RouteToWaitForAttributeResponse>(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
|
||||
Assert.Equal("wait-corr-gq", response.CorrelationId);
|
||||
Assert.True(response.Success, $"Routed quality-gated wait failed: {response.ErrorMessage}");
|
||||
Assert.True(response.Matched, "A Good-quality attribute at target must satisfy a RequireGoodQuality wait.");
|
||||
Assert.Equal("Good", response.Quality);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task RouteInboundApiWaitForAttribute_UnknownInstance_RepliesNotFound()
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user