test(loadharness): target-scale load harness for WP-4 / register #25 + row 50

Standalone console harness under tests/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.LoadHarness plus a
scaled-down Category=Performance smoke [Fact] in PerformanceTests. Deliberately an
Exe rather than an xunit suite: the Performance trait enables a filter but does not
exclude by default, so a 20-minute test would run on every 'dotnet test' of the slnx.

What is real: per-site ActorSystem + LocalDb SQLite file, the real DCL
(DataConnectionManagerActor/DataConnectionActor over a SimulatedDataConnection
registered through the documented DataConnectionFactory.RegisterAdapter seam), real
InstanceActors fed real TagValueUpdates, the real SiteStreamManager, real
StreamRelayActor + production-capacity bounded DropOldest channel, real
StoreAndForwardService/Storage, real SiteHealthCollector + CentralHealthAggregator.
Only the socket hops are stood in for.

Measures: end-to-end tag update latency (the emit instant rides
TagValueUpdate.Timestamp verbatim to the subscriber), instance ramp, memory
growth/CPU over a steady-state window, health report and debug view latency under
load, S&F concurrent buffering + drain throughput, and slow-subscriber isolation.
This commit is contained in:
Joseph Doherty
2026-08-15 02:23:04 -04:00
parent 986e6e7ad5
commit 20f6b0b969
17 changed files with 2419 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
using ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.LoadHarness;
namespace ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.PerformanceTests.TargetScale;
/// <summary>
/// Keeps the target-scale load harness (deferred-work register #25 / Phase-8 WP-4)
/// honest at CI scale.
///
/// <para>
/// The full protocol — 10 sites x 500 instances x 75 tags sustained for 20 minutes —
/// deliberately lives in the standalone <c>ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.LoadHarness</c>
/// executable, NOT here: perf tests in this project run as part of an ordinary
/// <c>dotnet test ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.slnx</c> (the <c>Category=Performance</c>
/// trait enables a filter, it does not exclude by default), and a 20-minute test
/// would be intolerable there. What this test protects is that the harness still
/// compiles, wires up, and produces coherent measurements — so #25's evidence can be
/// regenerated on demand rather than bit-rotting.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// Results doc: <c>docs/plans/2026-08-15-target-scale-load-test-results.md</c>.
/// Design memo: <c>docs/plans/2026-08-15-target-scale-load-test-design.md</c>.
/// </para>
/// </summary>
public class TargetScaleHarnessSmokeTests
{
/// <summary>
/// Runs the harness at ~1/1000th of target scale for a few seconds and asserts the
/// pipeline is intact end to end: tag updates reach live stream subscribers, the
/// central health aggregator tracks every site, debug snapshots answer, the
/// store-and-forward buffer drains to empty, and a stalled subscriber does not cost
/// the healthy ones any events.
/// </summary>
/// <returns>A task representing the test run.</returns>
[Trait("Category", "Performance")]
[Fact]
public async Task Harness_AtSmokeScale_ProducesCoherentMeasurements()
{
var config = new HarnessConfig
{
Sites = 2,
InstancesPerSite = 10,
TagsPerInstance = 5,
TagUpdatePeriod = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1),
SettleDuration = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5),
SustainDuration = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(15),
SampleInterval = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2),
// Shortened from the production 30 s only because the smoke window is 20 s.
HealthReportInterval = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2),
DebugProbeInterval = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2),
SubscribeSettleDuration = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5),
StreamProbesPerSite = 3,
StoreAndForwardDrainMessages = 200,
SlowSubscriberEvents = 2_000,
ResultsPath = Path.Combine(Path.GetTempPath(), $"loadharness-smoke-{Guid.NewGuid():N}.json"),
};
using var cancellation = new CancellationTokenSource(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10));
var result = await HarnessRun.ExecuteAsync(config, _ => { }, cancellation.Token);
// Tag updates flowed all the way through DCL -> InstanceActor -> site stream ->
// StreamRelayActor -> bounded channel -> subscriber.
Assert.True(result.TagUpdateLatency.Count > 0,
"No tag update latency samples — the DCL -> stream -> subscriber path did not carry traffic.");
Assert.True(result.StreamProbeReceived > 0, "Live stream subscribers received nothing.");
Assert.Equal(0, result.DriverSkippedNoCallback);
// Observability held up.
Assert.Equal(config.Sites, result.SitesTrackedByAggregator);
Assert.True(result.DebugSnapshotsCompleted > 0, "No debug snapshot completed.");
Assert.Equal(0, result.DebugSnapshotTimeouts);
// Store-and-forward drained completely (register row 50, first half).
Assert.NotNull(result.StoreAndForwardDrain);
Assert.Equal(0, result.StoreAndForwardDrain!.ResidualDepth);
Assert.True(result.StoreAndForwardDrain.DrainPerSecond > 0);
// A stalled subscriber costs the healthy ones nothing (register row 50, second
// half). This is the design's isolation claim, asserted rather than assumed.
Assert.NotNull(result.SlowSubscriber);
Assert.Equal(1.0, result.SlowSubscriber!.HealthyMinDeliveryRatio, precision: 2);
Assert.True(result.SlowSubscriber.SlowDeliveryRatio < 1.0,
"The deliberately stalled subscriber kept up, so the probe proved nothing.");
}
}
@@ -31,6 +31,9 @@
<ProjectReference Include="../../src/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.SiteRuntime/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.SiteRuntime.csproj" />
<!-- Two-node failover rig (TwoNodeClusterFixture) — brings Host + Akka transitively. -->
<ProjectReference Include="../../tests/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.IntegrationTests/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.IntegrationTests.csproj" />
<!-- Target-scale load harness (register #25). Referenced so TargetScaleHarnessSmokeTests
can run it at CI scale; the full-scale protocol run is the standalone executable. -->
<ProjectReference Include="../../tests/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.LoadHarness/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.LoadHarness.csproj" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>