fix(notifications): list sort index + CAS operator Retry/Discard (P5-3, P5-4)
P5-3: add IX_Notifications_Created_NotificationId (CreatedAt DESC, NotificationId DESC) — the Central UI Notification Outbox list page sorts on exactly that pair, but no existing index leads unconditionally on CreatedAt, so an unfiltered/lightly filtered page fell back to a full clustered-index scan + sort on every COUNT + page request. Mirrors the Medium wave's IX_SiteCalls_Created_TrackedOperationId migration + SQL twin pattern faithfully, including the handwritten docs/plans/sql script. P5-4: operator Retry/Discard was read-check-write keyed on NotificationId only — a detached PipeTo task interleaving with the dispatcher's own write (or a second concurrent operator action) could land between the read and the write and get silently clobbered by the unconditional UpdateAsync, stamping a Delivered row Discarded with stale fields. Adds INotificationOutboxRepository.TryUpdateFromParkedAsync, a single-statement compare-and-swap (WHERE Status == Parked) mirroring SecuredWriteRepository.TryMarkApprovedAsync's CAS shape. NotificationOutboxActor's RetryAsync/DiscardAsync now use the CAS write and, on a lost race, re-read to report "notification already progressed to <Status>" instead of silently overwriting whatever is there now. Proof of failure: reverting only the actor's CAS usage while keeping the repository addition reproduces the silent-overwrite bug — 7 tests fail, including two new deterministic (non-sleep) race-proof tests that mock the exact GetByIdAsync -> lost-CAS -> re-read sequence the finding describes. P5-3 is perf-only; verified via migration/SQL-twin parity instead (no runtime proof-of-failure is meaningful for an index).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1109,14 +1109,25 @@ public class NotificationOutboxActor : ReceiveActor, IWithTimers
|
||||
notification.NextAttemptAt = null;
|
||||
notification.LastError = null;
|
||||
|
||||
// Zero rows updated means the row was purged between the read above and
|
||||
// this write. Answer the operator honestly instead of reporting a
|
||||
// re-queue that never happened — and emit no un-park audit row, because
|
||||
// there is nothing to attribute it to.
|
||||
if (!await repository.UpdateAsync(notification))
|
||||
// Compare-and-swap on Status == Parked (arch-review 2026-08-19 P5-4). The
|
||||
// read above and this write are two separate round trips; a detached
|
||||
// PipeTo task can race the dispatcher's own write (or a second
|
||||
// concurrent operator action) in between, so the in-memory check above
|
||||
// is a fast-path rejection, not the correctness guard — a blind
|
||||
// UpdateAsync here could stamp a row that has already moved on (e.g. the
|
||||
// dispatcher delivered it) back to Pending with stale fields. A lost CAS
|
||||
// means either the row vanished (purge) or it progressed past Parked
|
||||
// under us; re-read to report which honestly instead of silently
|
||||
// overwriting whatever is there now, and emit no un-park audit row in
|
||||
// either case, because there is nothing to attribute it to.
|
||||
if (!await repository.TryUpdateFromParkedAsync(notification))
|
||||
{
|
||||
var current = await repository.GetByIdAsync(request.NotificationId);
|
||||
return new RetryNotificationResponse(
|
||||
request.CorrelationId, Success: false, ErrorMessage: "notification not found");
|
||||
request.CorrelationId, Success: false,
|
||||
ErrorMessage: current is null
|
||||
? "notification not found"
|
||||
: $"notification already progressed to {current.Status}; retry not applied");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Operator re-queued a parked notification. Emit a Submitted NotifyDeliver
|
||||
@@ -1190,13 +1201,22 @@ public class NotificationOutboxActor : ReceiveActor, IWithTimers
|
||||
|
||||
notification.Status = NotificationStatus.Discarded;
|
||||
|
||||
// Same vanished-row honesty as the retry path: a purge between the read
|
||||
// and the write leaves nothing to discard, so report not-found rather
|
||||
// than success (and skip the terminal audit row below).
|
||||
if (!await repository.UpdateAsync(notification))
|
||||
// Same compare-and-swap on Status == Parked as the retry path (arch-review
|
||||
// 2026-08-19 P5-4): a purge between the read and the write leaves nothing
|
||||
// to discard, and a dispatcher/other-operator write landing in that same
|
||||
// window (e.g. a delivery succeeding) must not be silently clobbered by a
|
||||
// blind write of this stale in-memory copy. Re-read on a lost CAS to
|
||||
// report which case it was, and skip the terminal audit row below either
|
||||
// way — there is nothing to attribute a discard of a row that was never
|
||||
// actually discarded.
|
||||
if (!await repository.TryUpdateFromParkedAsync(notification))
|
||||
{
|
||||
var current = await repository.GetByIdAsync(request.NotificationId);
|
||||
return new DiscardNotificationResponse(
|
||||
request.CorrelationId, Success: false, ErrorMessage: "notification not found");
|
||||
request.CorrelationId, Success: false,
|
||||
ErrorMessage: current is null
|
||||
? "notification not found"
|
||||
: $"notification already progressed to {current.Status}; discard not applied");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A manual discard is the OTHER code path that produces
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user