docs: site secrets ride the artifact deploy; gRPC hub retired in ScadaBridge

2026-09-28 20:22:45 -04:00
parent bc29dc412b
commit 0ccf68951d
8 changed files with 259 additions and 6 deletions
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ All 7 fix-now items landed via PLAN-04/05/06/07/08 (verified in review 08 round
 | 124 | **No template-graph-watermark short-circuit on the pending-updates fleet flatten** *(Low)*. `PendingUpdatesEvaluator.EvaluateAsync` re-flattens every deployed instance through `DeploymentService.GetInstanceStalenessAsync` on every cache-TTL expiry (`PendingUpdatesCacheTtl`, default 60 s) while any Deployer/Admin circuit is open, even when nothing in the template/instance/artifact graph has changed since the last evaluation. | `docs/plans/2026-09-14-pending-updates-design.md` §3.2 ("Not in scope") | The single-flight TTL cache already bounds the cost to one fleet flatten per TTL fleet-wide (not per viewer); a watermark short-circuit is a further optimization, not a correctness need, and needs a cheap "has anything changed" signal that does not exist yet. | The fleet flatten's cost (instance count x template depth) becomes measurable against `PendingUpdatesCacheTtl` on a large deployment. |
 | 125 | **Pending-updates counts have no Health-dashboard tile or CLI surface** *(Low)*. The aggregate (`PendingUpdatesSnapshot.StaleInstanceCount` / `StaleArtifactSiteCount`) is consumed only by the Central UI Sites page and rail indicator; there is no Health dashboard KPI tile and no `deploy`/`site` CLI command surfacing it — `site list` shows only the raw `artifactRevisionHash`/`artifactsDeployedAt` fields on each site, not whether they are current. | `docs/plans/2026-09-14-pending-updates-design.md` §3.2 ("Not in scope") | Out of scope for the UI-focused ask; the CLI/Health surfaces are a separate consumer of the same `IPendingUpdatesCache`. | An operator wants the pending-updates counts without opening the Central UI (headless monitoring, CLI scripting). |
 | 126 | ~~**TODO — roll the two outstanding migrations to the QA pair vq03/vq04**~~ **DONE 2026-09-28** — QA vq03/vq04 upgraded `2b9a7c3c` → `b3021e7c`, 55 → 57, artifacts deployed (record `docs/deployment/deployment-records/2026-09-28-wonder-app-vq03-vq04-b3021e7c.md`). *(deployment, closed)*. **DEV vd03 DONE 2026-09-28** (`fe89363b`, 55 → 57, record `docs/deployment/deployment-records/2026-09-28-wonder-app-vd03-fe89363b.md` — the `sb-mig-55to57.sql` there is the same script QA needs). QA still runs `2b9a7c3c` with the DB at migration 55 (`20260909203046_EnforceGlobalInstanceNamesAndProtectProtocolConfiguration`); `main` (`ac833f5a`, pushed 2026-09-14) carries two more: **56** `20260911135501_AddAlarmMesReportable` (computed-alarm `IsMesReportable` flag) and **57** `20260914173147_AddSiteArtifactRevision` (`Sites.ArtifactRevisionHash`/`ArtifactsDeployedAt`, both nullable). Both are additive `AddColumn`s — no data upgrade, no coordinated step like the 2026-09-10 protocol-config encryption. Recipe (same as the 55 rollout): generate ONE from→to delta script `dotnet ef migrations script EnforceGlobalInstanceNamesAndProtectProtocolConfiguration AddSiteArtifactRevision --project src/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.ConfigurationDatabase --startup-project src/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.Host -o sb-mig-55to57.sql` (NOT idempotent, identical for vd03 and the QA pair), take the pre-upgrade DB backup, stop the pair TOGETHER, apply via `sqlcmd -C -b -I` on the SQL host, publish/swap the `ac833f5a` binaries, start the pair, confirm the Central boot log shows 0 pending migrations and no "Applying migration" (the script already applied them). After upgrade every site reads *Artifacts never deployed* until one *Deploy Artifacts to All Sites* — run it as the last step. Write the deployment record `docs/deployment/deployment-records/<date>-wonder-app-{vd03,vq03-vq04}-ac833f5a.md`. | Pending-updates finish (2026-09-14) | ~~Blocked by the 2026-09-11 remote-access hold~~ — **unblocked 2026-09-28**: `winrm` is re-enabled for deployment activities (CLAUDE.md). vd03 done; QA done 2026-09-28. | Closed 2026-09-28. |
+| 127 | **TODO — roll out site secrets via artifact deploy to vd03 + QA (vq03/vq04)**. The gRPC secrets hub is retired in ScadaBridge as of `docs/plans/2026-09-28-site-secrets-artifact-deploy-design.md` (implemented on branch `feat/site-secrets-artifact-deploy`, rig-only so far); vd03 and QA still run the pre-feature build with `Secrets:Replication:Enabled=false`, so upgrading them to a build carrying this change will **not** itself fail fast (the retirement's `StartupValidator` rejection only fires on `Enabled=true`, which neither environment sets) — but a site still needs the four prerequisites below before *Deploy Artifacts* will actually deliver its secrets. Prerequisites, in order: (1) provision the `zbsecrets` schema/store in the environment's configuration SQL Server (the same server `ConfigurationDb` already points at); (2) set `Secrets:Store:Provider=SqlServer` on **both** central nodes of the environment; (3) verify the KEK (`ZB_SECRETS_MASTER_KEY` / master-key file) is identical across **every** node — both centrals and every site node — since a mismatch is caught only at deploy time by `DeployedSecretsMirror`'s per-secret verify, not at boot; (4) recreate, at the new central shared store, any secret an operator previously hand-seeded directly into a site's local `secrets.db` (those never round-tripped through central and would otherwise be silently absent from the referenced-secrets scan). Then run *Deploy Artifacts* against every affected site as the rollout's last step. | `docs/plans/2026-09-28-site-secrets-artifact-deploy-design.md` §4 *Rollout*; `docs/deployment/topology-guide.md` → *Secrets: shared store, per-site deploy, and the KEK* | Deployment record, not a code change — vd03/QA config is user-held and their rollout schedule is independent of the branch merging to main. | User asks for the vd03/QA secrets window. |

 ## Resolved (verified against the code 2026-07-10)
 Rows removed from the Deferred table above once confirmed shipped. Kept here for traceability.