fix(audit): fail closed when a configured redactor is unavailable (#35)
Component-AuditLog.md has always required "we over-redact, never under-redact, on configuration faults", but the body / SQL-parameter redactors violated it. AuditRegexCache rejects a pattern that is malformed OR whose compile exceeds a 100 ms budget, caching the rejection for the process lifetime. ScadaBridgeAuditRedactor then simply dropped the rejected pattern from its redactor set and emitted the payload anyway — publishing precisely the values the operator configured it to suppress, onto a row that looks entirely normal downstream. Recovery required a process restart and the only signal was one Warning line. The SQL path was worse: TryGetSqlParamRedactor returned a bare false for both "no redactor configured for this connection" and "the configured one will not compile", and CLAUDE.md records SQL parameter capture as on by default. Two changes: 1. Fail closed. A pattern that is CONFIGURED but unavailable now over-redacts the whole payload and increments AuditRedactionFailure, reusing the existing safety-net path. "Not configured at all" stays permissive — conflating those two states is the actual defect, so both are pinned by tests. 2. Precompile off the hot path. The audit-log roadmap specifies patterns are "precompiled at startup; rejected if compile takes >100ms"; the implementation had drifted to compiling lazily on first event, which put a wall-clock budget on a hot path under production load. RegexOptions.Compiled emits IL during construction, so a busy node could blow the budget on a perfectly valid pattern. Warm-up now runs at construction and on every options reload. The residual window between a reload and its warm-up is safe because that path now fails closed. Warm-up deliberately does not fail the boot — an unusable pattern degrades the node to over-redaction (safe, loud) rather than refusing to start. Reading CurrentValue happens inside the warm-up try so an options provider that throws still surfaces via Apply's over-redact path, not the constructor (OuterCatch_OptionsThrows_NeverLeaks_AllSensitiveFieldsOverRedacted). Also de-flakes GrpcCentralTransportTests.DeadlineExceeded_IsNotRetriedOnThePeer, which is how this was found. It black-holed node A behind a 300 ms deadline, but on a saturated machine the call could fail to even START — a genuinely-unsent failure that IsConnectFailure correctly fails over on, so node B's ack arrived instead of the expected Status.Failure. The test read as a flake while actually reporting that its own premise had not held. Split in two: the hard rule now injects an explicit DeadlineExceeded via a trailers-only response (deterministic, load-independent), and a new BlackHoledNode_DoesNotHang covers the deadline-is-actually-applied half with both nodes black-holed so no ack can arrive down any path. Verified: both fixes were confirmed to fail before they pass — reverting the fail-closed guard fails exactly the 5 fail-closed tests while the 4 controls still pass, and adding DeadlineExceeded to IsConnectFailure fails the rewritten transport test. AuditLog 367/367, Host.Tests GrpcCentralTransport 8/8, solution build clean. The previously-intermittent Filter_PicksUp_NewBodyRedactor_OnConfigReload is green in a full sweep for the first time. Not addressed here, and noted on #35: the 100 ms wall-clock budget remains a weak proxy for catastrophic backtracking (RegexOptions.Compiled defers JIT to first match, so construction time measures the wrong thing), and a rejection is still cached permanently. Both are now safe rather than dangerous, so they are hardening rather than a leak.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -64,8 +64,16 @@ public class GrpcCentralTransportTests : IAsyncLifetime
|
||||
backoffBase: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50),
|
||||
backoffCap: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(200));
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// When set, node A's handler short-circuits every call with this gRPC status
|
||||
/// instead of reaching its TestServer. See <see cref="GrpcStatusHandler"/>.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
private Grpc.Core.StatusCode? _nodeAForcedStatus;
|
||||
|
||||
private HttpMessageHandler HandlerFor(string endpoint) => endpoint == EndpointA
|
||||
? new ToggleHandler(_nodeA.Server.CreateHandler(), () => _nodeA.IsUp)
|
||||
? new GrpcStatusHandler(
|
||||
new ToggleHandler(_nodeA.Server.CreateHandler(), () => _nodeA.IsUp),
|
||||
() => _nodeAForcedStatus)
|
||||
: new ToggleHandler(_nodeB.Server.CreateHandler(), () => _nodeB.IsUp);
|
||||
|
||||
private GrpcCentralTransport NewTransport(CentralChannelProvider provider, CommunicationOptions? options = null)
|
||||
@@ -182,10 +190,43 @@ public class GrpcCentralTransportTests : IAsyncLifetime
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task DeadlineExceeded_IsNotRetriedOnThePeer()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// THE hard rule. Node A is UP but never replies, so the call deadlines. The transport must
|
||||
// surface Status.Failure and must NOT try node B (the call may already have executed).
|
||||
// THE hard rule: on DeadlineExceeded the call may ALREADY have executed, so the transport
|
||||
// must surface Status.Failure and must NOT try node B.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The status is injected rather than produced by black-holing node A behind a short
|
||||
// deadline. That older setup was load-dependent and failed intermittently in full-solution
|
||||
// sweeps: on a saturated machine the call could fail to even START, which IsConnectFailure
|
||||
// correctly classifies as provably-unsent, so the transport failed over and node B's ack
|
||||
// arrived instead of a Status.Failure. The test then read as a flake while actually
|
||||
// reporting that its own premise had not held. Injecting the status makes the failure mode
|
||||
// the test's subject rather than a race — see BlackHoledNode_DoesNotHang for the
|
||||
// deadline-is-actually-applied half.
|
||||
_nodeAForcedStatus = Grpc.Core.StatusCode.DeadlineExceeded;
|
||||
|
||||
using var provider = NewProvider();
|
||||
var transport = NewTransport(provider);
|
||||
var inbox = new Capture(_system);
|
||||
|
||||
transport.SubmitNotification(NewSubmit("n1"), inbox.Ref);
|
||||
|
||||
Assert.IsType<Status.Failure>(inbox.Receive(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5)));
|
||||
Assert.Equal(0, provider.CurrentIndex); // no failover on a deadline
|
||||
Assert.Equal(0, _nodeB.SubmitCount); // peer never tried
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task BlackHoledNode_DoesNotHang_APerCallDeadlineIsApplied()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// The other half of the split: a node that accepts the call and never replies must not
|
||||
// hang the caller forever — a per-call deadline bounds it. Both nodes black-hole, so this
|
||||
// holds whichever node the transport ends up on and the assertion cannot be perturbed by
|
||||
// whether the machine was loaded enough to turn the stall into a connect failure.
|
||||
_nodeA.SetBlackHole();
|
||||
var shortDeadline = new CommunicationOptions { NotificationForwardTimeout = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(300) };
|
||||
_nodeB.SetBlackHole();
|
||||
var shortDeadline = new CommunicationOptions
|
||||
{
|
||||
NotificationForwardTimeout = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(300),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
using var provider = NewProvider();
|
||||
var transport = NewTransport(provider, shortDeadline);
|
||||
@@ -193,10 +234,9 @@ public class GrpcCentralTransportTests : IAsyncLifetime
|
||||
|
||||
transport.SubmitNotification(NewSubmit("n1"), inbox.Ref);
|
||||
|
||||
// A per-call deadline is applied (the call returns fast instead of hanging on the black hole).
|
||||
// Returns rather than hanging: the 5 s inbox wait is far longer than the 300 ms deadline,
|
||||
// so a missing deadline shows up as a TimeoutException from Receive.
|
||||
Assert.IsType<Status.Failure>(inbox.Receive(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5)));
|
||||
Assert.Equal(0, provider.CurrentIndex); // no failover on a deadline
|
||||
Assert.Equal(0, _nodeB.SubmitCount); // peer never tried
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static NotificationSubmit NewSubmit(string id) => new(
|
||||
@@ -250,6 +290,49 @@ public class GrpcCentralTransportTests : IAsyncLifetime
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Short-circuits a call with a chosen gRPC status, so a test can pick the exact failure class
|
||||
/// the transport must classify instead of trying to provoke it with timing.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
/// <remarks>
|
||||
/// Emits a trailers-only response: HTTP 200 with <c>grpc-status</c> in the HEADERS and an empty
|
||||
/// body, which is the shape gRPC defines for a call that fails before producing a message and
|
||||
/// which <c>Grpc.Net.Client</c> surfaces as an <c>RpcException</c> carrying that status.
|
||||
/// </remarks>
|
||||
private sealed class GrpcStatusHandler : DelegatingHandler
|
||||
{
|
||||
private readonly Func<Grpc.Core.StatusCode?> _forced;
|
||||
|
||||
public GrpcStatusHandler(HttpMessageHandler inner, Func<Grpc.Core.StatusCode?> forced)
|
||||
{
|
||||
InnerHandler = inner;
|
||||
_forced = forced;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected override async Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(
|
||||
HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var forced = _forced();
|
||||
if (forced == null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return await base.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var response = new HttpResponseMessage(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.OK)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Version = new Version(2, 0),
|
||||
Content = new ByteArrayContent(Array.Empty<byte>()),
|
||||
RequestMessage = request,
|
||||
};
|
||||
response.Content.Headers.ContentType =
|
||||
new System.Net.Http.Headers.MediaTypeHeaderValue("application/grpc");
|
||||
response.Headers.TryAddWithoutValidation(
|
||||
"grpc-status", ((int)forced.Value).ToString(System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture));
|
||||
response.Headers.TryAddWithoutValidation("grpc-message", "injected by GrpcStatusHandler");
|
||||
return response;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>A gRPC channel handler that throws (a refused connection) while its node is "down".</summary>
|
||||
private sealed class ToggleHandler : DelegatingHandler
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user